The question on many people’s minds, most likely, is on what conditions the patent right can protect an invention or creation. Given that inventive judgments are highly subjective, how does it cause differences in the conclusion of judging inventiveness?
Mr. Xing Kang, the partner, attorney at law, and the senior patent attorney of Lung Tin Law Firm, in collaboration with PatSnap, brought a live broadcast entitled "Refined Considerations for Commenting Inventiveness" to the audience at 19:30 on Thursday, October 28.
Mr. Kang has rich experiences in patent matters, primarily focuses on patent application and prosecution, reexamination, invalidation, patent administrative and civil litigation and IP counseling in the fields of semiconductor, electronics, computer science, communications, display and lighting, mechanics, etc... Prior to joining Lung Tin in April 2014, he had been working as an examiner for nearly ten years in the Electrical Department of SIPO and a re-examiner in the Patent Reexamination Board of SIPO. Mr. Kang has represented many important patent invalidation and litigation cases in electrical area and is well recognized for his excellence in services by clients including some of the most famous companies in China.
With the content of this IP broadcast based on the typical cases and the adjudication gist issued by the Supreme Intellectual Property Court in the past two years, Mr. Kang analyzed and explained the inventiveness judgment in combination with multiple cases. With the warm interaction with the audience in the last twenty minutes, this webinar ended on reasonably amicable terms.